So - let me add way more to the can of worms. But also maybe helpful in formulating your decision.
Its not just the brand & model you need to consider.
You also need to consider the engineers who designed it - and did the engineers also consider manufacturing process and build location. The Germans are typically seen within the industry by design engineers (product development) as the leaders in design engineering. Its one of the reasons why the G-Class Benz is so strong off road and still pretty good on road. Its also for this reason - the L322 was one of Range Rovers best (designed by BMW engineers with Land Rover expertise). LR3 was also largely BMW. And lots of BMW parts (and Bosch). However - it was built in Solihull. But a good design engineer will try to ensure that most labour related construction is not workmanship affected. However - despite best intentions of design engineers - the production line can see quality issues (e.g. first ML Mercedes built in Alabama. Second model the production engineers sorted the issues). With the Cruiser and Patrol - both designed and built on Japan - quality has been mostly good.
This build location does very much apply to Jeep. With Grand Cherokees - left hand drive are built in the US - but RHD were built in Austria (and the built quality is substancially better - arguably better than even the Japanese). Build location also applies to most of the 4WD utes - almost all are built in Thailand now (and quaility is very good - but not as good always as Japan). Adding an extra dynamic is WHO is the prime market? Patrol and Cruiser both look at the Middle East as the most important markets today. Hence today's engine offer. Nissan & Mitsubishi both looked at US as the main market for Pathfinder and Pajero (Montero) - and more recently - Toyota with Prado (Lexus GX),
And another thing to consider - what are the parts that are sourced externally - and what is the quality of these. Other than engine and body - almost everything else in almost everything on the road is from external suppliers (Tier 1 for direct - tier 2 for minor components. Bosch, Delphi, Denso are all mostly Tier 1 - whereas say a wheel manufacturer or windscreen could be Tier 2). In recent times - profitability pressure globally has applied pressure to cutting costs at all suppliers. So reliability has suffered. Point in case - current recall of Takata Airbags (although the big issues for these were in hi humidity areas - and the company seen as hiding test results). Speaking of recalls - you will have seen more recalls over the last few years from some of the best - including Toyota - due to an increasingly demanding customer AND pressure on suppliers and the need to cut costs.
Yet another consideration - what version in the lifecycle of the model. The first model is usually the highest level of design spec - to ensure it hits the market well and is reflective of the designers direction. Subesequent models are usually cheapened (small example - L322 headlights - first one had two piece headlight / indicator assemblies and auto headlight adjusting - later one had single piece headlight and no auto adjust). But the last of a series typically have all design issues sorted - and often are speced up with latest big ticket items like engine. On my SL55 - the early engines were a problem - post 2004 they sorted it out (and on AMG's - in the US - some customers look for specific engine builders as they think better build quality or higher HP). Relevance to you - some engines are better than other (Toyota 1HZ and Nissan 4.2TD). Some gearboxes are better than others (read all the negatives on 200 series top gear on auto).
As if these things were bad enough on adding complexity to your choice - you also need to consider monocoque versus ladder frame chassis. Ladder Frame is typically better off road out of the box - and way cheaper to modify. Typically most ladder frame construction have live axles. Monocoque is stronger (check the 1950's Citroen Traction Avante - pushed off a cliff - and at the bottom - the engineers get in and drive away). Stronger also mean safer - a monocoque will dissapate the force of a side impact a lot better than a ladder frame. Monocoque is typically more reliable and predictable for crash engineers in front impact. The ride quality on road is better in a monocoque.
LR3 and RR have had a lot of design engineering on ensuring off road in a monocoque is much better (some would say as good as ladder frame).
So for you - if you want better on road performance and safety - I'd probably look at Pajero or Prado - and as slightly left field option -- the LR3 (make sure you get the electronic spares mentioned on AULRO from UK). Watch out for diesel service history - otherwise consider petrol.
Reply